上週有個小夥伴問有沒有大修意見（Major Revision）的模板，我的第一反應是大修哪還有什麼模板啊，就是一條一條的回覆審稿人的修改建議啊。不過後來翻了翻自己以前寫的回覆信，發現多多少少還是有一定模板性的，尤其是對於第一次遇到這種情況的研究生朋友們，可以先從模板開始熟悉一下此類回覆信的大體內容和形式。
模板1：精簡版本
下面這個是小編自己以前寫的一個模板，拿出來分享給大家。
Dear Editor XX and Reviewers,
Thanks very much for taking your time to review this manuscript. I really appreciate all your comments and suggestions! Please find my itemized responses in below and my revisions/corrections in the re-submitted files. （這一段基本上是套話）
Thanks again!
下面就開始回覆文章的審稿意見了，一般首先是回覆期刊編輯的整體意見：
SUGGESTIONS FROM EDITOR（注意這一段要把編輯原始的建議粘貼在這裡，不能只有回應）
Your response to the general comments from the editor接下來是逐條回應審稿人的建議：
COMMENTS TO THE AUTHOR:
Reviewer #1:
Response to the questions one by one
Reviewer #2:
Response to the questions one by one
模板2: 完整版本
這個模板是我在網上找到的，經發布者授權，轉載到這裡。這個模板保留了很多逐條回答審稿人的常用短語和句式，值得收藏和學習！
Dear Editor, Dear reviewers
Thank you for your letter dated February 22. We were pleased to know that our work was rated as potentially acceptable for publication in Journal, subject to adequate revision. We thank the reviewers for the time and effort that they have put into reviewing the previous version of the manuscript. Their suggestions have enabled us to improve our work. Based on the instructions provided in your letter, we uploaded the file of the revised manuscript. Accordingly, we have uploaded a copy of the original manuscript with all the changes highlighted by using the track changes mode in MS Word.
Appended to this letter is our point-by-point response to the comments raised by the reviewers. The comments are reproduced and our responses are given directly afterward in a different color (red).
We would like also to thank you for allowing us to resubmit a revised copy of the manuscript.
We hope that the revised manuscript is accepted for publication in the Journal of Mountain Science.
Sincerely,
XXXXXXX
（同樣是套話，這個模板寫了這麼長。。。雖然小編不是很喜歡，但是適合拿來逐句學習，為己所用）Reviewer 1：Comments to the Author
這個審稿人的意見分為兩部分：
第一部分是一般性的評論和修改建議（多為比較大的問題）。
Here are the general comments from the reviewer...
We thank the reviewer for the very interesting comments. In fact…
Regarding the suggestion about the methods, we changed this part…
Another issue on the methodological section is that...
We are grateful for the suggestion. To be more clear and in accordance with the reviewer concerns, we have added a brief description as follows: “
接下來是第二部分“小的建議”，也就是需要逐條回覆的那種，一般是用詞用句的修改。
Minor comments:
The title is too long, I suggest shortening.
Thank you for the title suggested. The precedent version of the title has been replaced, becoming...Line 25, page 1…
Modified throughout the text according to the comment (Line 20, page 1).
Line 18, page 2…
We have modified the sentence according to the previous comment (Line 30, page 2).
Line 33, page 3…
Thank you for underlining this deficiency. This section was revised and modified according to the information showed in the work suggested by the reviewer (Line 41, page 3).
Line 59, page 5…
This phrase was modified according to the comment (Line 30, page 5).
Lines 9-24, page 6…
Thank you for the suggestion. We have added the information required as explained above (Lines 6-28, page 6).
Line 11, page 6…
This sentence was rephrased according to the comment (Line 8, page 6).
Line 35, page 13: “exit section”->”outlet” (please check also throughout the text, e.g. at line 54, page 13)
We have modified this expression throughout the text according to the comment.
閱讀更多 投必得學術 的文章
關鍵字: 回覆 according manuscript
