Spring 循环依赖问题fix

拆分的时候,把error都处理完后,准备把工程起起来,发现spring的循环依赖问题。具体问题如下

Spring 循环依赖问题fix

Bean with name 'userManager' has been injected into other beans [daoAuthenticationProvider] in its raw version as part of a circular reference, but has eventually been wrapped (for example as part of auto-proxy creation). This means that said other beans do not use the final version of the bean. This is often the result of over-eager type matching - consider using 'getBeanNamesOfType' with the 'allowEagerInit' flag turned off, for example.

1. 怀疑配置文件的问题

但是在原工程中并没有这个问题,所以一开始怀疑是配置文件的配置不一样,百度了一下这个error

beanFactory.setAllowRawInjectionDespiteWrapping(true); 

看网上说这个配置了,对于循环依赖的这个error就会解决掉。但是在两个工程里搜索了一下都没有发现这个配置过。

于是只能debug进去看看

2. debug 查看 分析

2.1 spring 引用的bean和注入的bean不一致导致的这个error

由于在原工程里是可以循环引用的,所以对工程和新工程都在初始化这两个循环引用的位置进行了debug

然后发现最后两边走的逻辑不一样的在以下的代码里:

AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.doCreateBean()final String beanName, final RootBeanDefinition mbd, final Object[] args: ... Object earlySingletonReference = getSingleton(beanName, false); if (earlySingletonReference != null) { if (exposedObject == bean) { // 原工程走到了这里 exposedObject = earlySingletonReference; } else if (!this.allowRawInjectionDespiteWrapping && hasDependentBean(beanName)) { // 新的有error的bean走到里这里 String[] dependentBeans = getDependentBeans(beanName); Set actualDependentBeans = new LinkedHashSet(dependentBeans.length); for (String dependentBean : dependentBeans) { if (!removeSingletonIfCreatedForTypeCheckOnly(dependentBean)) { actualDependentBeans.add(dependentBean); } } if (!actualDependentBeans.isEmpty()) { throw new BeanCurrentlyInCreationException(beanName, "Bean with name '" + beanName + "' has been injected into other beans [" + StringUtils.collectionToCommaDelimitedString(actualDependentBeans) + "] in its raw version as part of a circular reference, but has eventually been " + "wrapped. This means that said other beans do not use the final version of the " + "bean. This is often the result of over-eager type matching - consider using " + "'getBeanNamesOfType' with the 'allowEagerInit' flag turned off, for example."); } } } ...

从这里已经可以看到,是新工程中的 exposedObject 和 bean不一样导致的

而这两者的关系如下面的代码

// Initialize the bean instance. Object exposedObject = bean; try { populateBean(beanName, mbd, instanceWrapper); if (exposedObject != null) { exposedObject = initializeBean(beanName, exposedObject, mbd); } } catch (Throwable ex) { if (ex instanceof BeanCreationException && beanName.equals(((BeanCreationException) ex).getBeanName())) { throw (BeanCreationException) ex; } else { throw new BeanCreationException(mbd.getResourceDescription(), beanName, "Initialization of bean failed", ex); } }

也就是说exposedObject 在initializeBean 函数之后变掉了

2.2 AnnotationAwareAspectJAutoProxyCreator把返回值修改了

然后发现在applyBeanPostProcessorsAfterInitialization 函数中,AnnotationAwareAspectJAutoProxyCreator修改了返回的result

public Object postProcessAfterInitialization(Object bean, String beanName) throws BeansException { if (bean != null) { Object cacheKey = getCacheKey(bean.getClass(), beanName); if (!this.earlyProxyReferences.contains(cacheKey)) { return wrapIfNecessary(bean, beanName, cacheKey); } } return bean; }

逻辑如上,也就是说earlyProxyReferences 这个里不存在这个cacheKey

2.3 怀疑是自定义的annotaion修改导致

因为函数中,AnnotationAwareAspectJAutoProxyCreator是处理annotaion的相关。需要预处理Proxy。

往远工程里加了这个annatation, 但是debug发现原工程里的这样的annotaion也没有问题

2.4 配置文件里起了两个AnnotationAwareAspectJAutoProxyCreator,才导致了这个问题

看了一下earlyProxyReferences 会在哪一步进行put进入。

发现在Factory.getObject()的时候会调用。然后断点到put的地方,也确实put进入了

但是再debug到postProcessAfterInitialization的时候,发现contains就是不对

然后看了下看了一下earlyProxyReferences的值,发现居然有两个AnnotationAwareAspectJAutoProxyCreator

然后干掉之后确实是可以的

3. 两个AnnotationAwareAspectJAutoProxyCreator 导致这个问题的原因

因为调用actory.getObject() 时. 调用下面的方法,

protected Object getEarlyBeanReference(String beanName, RootBeanDefinition mbd, Object bean) { Object exposedObject = bean; if (bean != null && !mbd.isSynthetic() && hasInstantiationAwareBeanPostProcessors()) { for (BeanPostProcessor bp : getBeanPostProcessors()) { if (bp instanceof SmartInstantiationAwareBeanPostProcessor) { SmartInstantiationAwareBeanPostProcessor ibp = (SmartInstantiationAwareBeanPostProcessor) bp; exposedObject = ibp.getEarlyBeanReference(exposedObject, beanName); if (exposedObject == null) { return exposedObject; } } } } return exposedObject; }

就会导致两个的AnnotationAwareAspectJAutoProxyCreator的earlyProxyReferences中含有不一样的代理对象

而在最后匹配时的逻辑

public Object applyBeanPostProcessorsAfterInitialization(Object existingBean, String beanName)
throws BeansException {
Object result = existingBean;
for (BeanPostProcessor beanProcessor : getBeanPostProcessors()) {
result = beanProcessor.postProcessAfterInitialization(result, beanName);
if (result == null) {
return result;
}
}
return result;
}

第二个AnnotationAwareAspectJAutoProxyCreator 发现earlyProxyReferences 不存在第

一个的代理对象的值,返回自己的代理对象,结果导致不一样

4. 解决方法

干掉一个 AnnotationAwareAspectJAutoProxyCreator, 这个循环依赖的error,就处理了

关注、转发、评论头条号每天分享java知识,私信回复“555”赠送一些Dubbo、Redis、Netty、zookeeper、Spring cloud、分布式资料


分享到:


相關文章: