量子糾纏理論可信嗎？

Essentially, Einstein’s celebrated equation is multiplied by a scaling parameter g= f/2, where f is half the probability of quantum entanglement [14].

Einstein’s equation is replaced by an effective quantum gravity formula:

E =g mc = [1/2(1 – b)/(1 +

which recovers Newton’s kinetic energyE = ½ mv, when b is set to 0 or 3; while setting b = 4 + f or b = fresults in Einstein’s non quantum but relativistic formula E = mc.

In particle physics, it is proposed that at the Planck energy scale of around 1.22 x10 GeV, which corresponds by mass energy equivalence E = mc to the Planck mass 2.17659 x 10 kg, the quantum effects of gravity becomes strong and expected to be comparable to other forces; and it is theorized that all the fundamental forces are unified at that scale, though the exact mechanism of this unification remains unknown [15].

At the other extreme of huge distances, quantum corrections accumulate and relativity cannot ignore quantum effects. Hence Einstein’s E

Quantum relativity theory is seen as the intersection of three fundamental theories of physics, hence predicts only 4.5 % of the mass-energy in Einstein’s E= mc equation, in accordance with cosmological measurement, with the rest being dark matter-energy.

There are four steps in generalizing E =mc of special relativity to quantum relativity or effective quantum gravity formula E =g = (mc)/22.1803989.. (the relevance for the denominator will be explained later).

The first step transforms space, time and mass to a probabilistic space, time and mass using quantum mechanics, leading to E = (P/2)mc where Pis the quantum entanglement probability. Second, a special form of E =

The probability of quantum entanglement of two quantum particles in Lucien Hardy’s thought experiment as derived in Eq (7) above is:

P = [p(1 –p1)p(1 – p)]/(1 -pp) (9)

For p = p = d

P = d (1 –d)/(1 +d) (10)

Now, introducing the probabilistic transformation:

Space (X) → xp

Time (T) → tp

Mass (M) →mp

Inserting into Newton’s kinetic energy, one finds the following probabilistic energy for v → c (velocity approaching the speed of light)

E = ½ mp (xp/tp) = ½ mp (v→c)(11)

Substituting p in Equation (3) for the probability of entanglement in Eq (2) gives:

E = ½ d[(1 –d)/(1 + d)]mc (12)

From relativity theory three phenomenological effects are well known: time dilation, length contraction and increase in mass when velocity approaches the speed of light. This is represented by some unspecified correction factor b.

x → x(1 – b

t → t(1 +b) (13)

m → m(1 + b)

Consequently, Newton’s relativistic kinetic energy becomes

E= ½ mc (1 + b) [(1 – b)/(1 +b)] = ½ [(1 – b)/(1 +

The next step to arrive at an effective quantum gravity E is to require

E = E(15)

Therefore,

d[(1 –d)/(1 + d)] = [(1 – b)/(1 +b)] (16)

This is only possible for d = b

b[(1 – b)/(1 + b)] = [(1 –b)/(1 + b)] (17)

which leads to the simple quadratic equation

b + b - 1 = 0 (18)

and the solutions: b =

In the fourth and final step, the correct expression for the quantum gravity formula is given by setting d = b = finto Eq. (6)

E = ½ f[(1 – f)/(1 + f)] mc

= ½ f

= (probability of quantum entanglement)/2) mc

Eq (19) E = mc/22.18033989 approximates E = mc/22, and can be given different simple interpretations. First, the factor 22 can be regarded as what remains of the 26 dimensions of string spacetime of the original bosonic strong interactions theory (see Box) after subtracting Einstein’s 4 dimensions. Then, the 26-4 = 22 dimensions “dilute” the energy content of the cosmos and reduce it from 100/22 ~4.5 %, in agreement with the cosmological measurement of the three 2011 Nobel Laureates.

This interpretation of energy content is not quite the same as that in the previous sections. Intriguingly, the link to quantum entanglement not only combines quantum theory with gravity, but suggests that gravity may be a form of quantum entanglement (though El Naschie himself has not said so).

Golden ratio and transfinite corrections to integer dimensional symmetry groups of string theories

The significance of the golden ratio lies in the extension of the concept dimensions, originally applying only to integers, to non-integers. All high energy particle physics theories are currently constrained to Lie algebra groups with integer dimensions that are also a differentiable manifold. Just as the concept of dimension has been expanded from integer topological to a non-integer Hausdorff dimension, the same could be done for a Lie manifold. In fact, irrational small corrections to integer Lie group dimensions would be a blessing for the overall model. Gauge anomalies (anomalies under transformation) in the standard model arise from the clash of integer symmetries (invariant properties under transformation). With transfinite (beyond the finite, but not absolute infinite) irrational corrections, i.e., fuzzy tail added or subtracted from the original integer dimension, we get fuzzy symmetry group dimensions that fit together harmoniously and eliminate gauge anomalies.
!在過去的75年裡，人們對此進行了廣泛的實驗研究。發現了z-p，u-e衰變和m俘獲，它被獨立地注意到了。克萊因，蒂奧莫和惠勒，李，羅森布拉斯和我相互作用與b-交互具有大致相同的優勢。它們是稱為弱互動，在過去幾年中，他們的地位一直在不斷。通過發現許多其他弱的相互作用對奇怪的部分的衰敗負責。一致的和引人注目的他們幾乎一致的力量模式仍然是今天最誘人的模式之一。現象-我們稍後會再討論的話題。最後一類力，引力，我們只需要提到原子和核的相互作用是如此微弱以至於完全可以忽略不計在所有的觀察中使用現有的技術。現在回到8r難題。1953年，Dalitz和Fabri7指出在8和t的衰變中…結論：(A)過去關於弱相互作用的實驗實際上對平等保護問題沒有任何影響。(B)在強相互作用中，即上文討論的第1和第2類的相互作用中，確實有許多實驗建立了奇偶守恆精確度很高，但不夠高，不能揭示了弱相互作用中缺乏奇偶守恆的影響。弱相互作用中的奇偶守恆被認為是所以沒有實驗的支持是非常令人吃驚的。但是更重要的是令人吃驚的是，物理學家們認為時空對稱定律(這種前景並沒有引起人們的興趣。我們，可以說，是因為對其他各種努力，以理解8r的謎題，已經制造了10。我們稍後會提到，物理學中有一個守恆定律-Interac…的同位素自旋守恆奇偶守恆的分解引起了許多問題的關注。關於物理學中的對稱性定律，我們現在將簡要討論((A)正如lee博士所討論的，吳、安布勒及他們的實驗。合作者還證明了13，14電荷共軛不變被違反了。對於/？-衰變.另一種稱為時間反轉不變性的對稱性在()反射不變性、電荷共軛三種離散不變性不變性和時間反轉不變性-由一個重要的定理17稱為CPT定理。利用這個定理我們可以證明13關於實驗表現的一些一般結果在弱相互作用中可能違反這三種對稱性。特別令人感興趣的是，時間反轉不變性在弱的相互作用可能是完整的。雖然奇偶守恆破壞的cpt定理，右…不像洛倫茲不變性或反射不變性，它不是與時空有關的幾何對稱律。不變性.不象電荷共軛不變性21似乎起源於複數的代數性質發生在量子力學中，在這些方面類似於守恆電荷定律和重粒子定律。然而，後一種定律是精確的。而同位素自旋守恆在引入電磁相互作用和弱相互作用同位素自旋守恆的起源及其與自旋守恆的結合其他對稱性定律無疑是當前最突出的問題之一。之前提到過所有不同品種的弱者相互作用具有非常相似的力量的特性。過去一年關於宇稱非守恆的實驗工作表明，他們也很可能分享不尊重平價守恆的特性。和電荷共軛不變性。因此，它們有助於區分一旦一個人確定了物質的定義，就會向左和向右移動.人們也可以利用弱相互作用來區分物質。反物質一旦選擇了右對左的定義，如果時間倒轉的話。不變性被違背，弱的相互作用甚至可以用來區分。同時從左向右，從反物質出發。