量子纠缠理论可信吗？

Essentially, Einstein’s celebrated equation is multiplied by a scaling parameter g= f/2, where f is half the probability of quantum entanglement [14].

Einstein’s equation is replaced by an effective quantum gravity formula:

E =g mc = [1/2(1 – b)/(1 +

which recovers Newton’s kinetic energyE = ½ mv, when b is set to 0 or 3; while setting b = 4 + f or b = fresults in Einstein’s non quantum but relativistic formula E = mc.

In particle physics, it is proposed that at the Planck energy scale of around 1.22 x10 GeV, which corresponds by mass energy equivalence E = mc to the Planck mass 2.17659 x 10 kg, the quantum effects of gravity becomes strong and expected to be comparable to other forces; and it is theorized that all the fundamental forces are unified at that scale, though the exact mechanism of this unification remains unknown [15].

At the other extreme of huge distances, quantum corrections accumulate and relativity cannot ignore quantum effects. Hence Einstein’s E

Quantum relativity theory is seen as the intersection of three fundamental theories of physics, hence predicts only 4.5 % of the mass-energy in Einstein’s E= mc equation, in accordance with cosmological measurement, with the rest being dark matter-energy.

There are four steps in generalizing E =mc of special relativity to quantum relativity or effective quantum gravity formula E =g = (mc)/22.1803989.. (the relevance for the denominator will be explained later).

The first step transforms space, time and mass to a probabilistic space, time and mass using quantum mechanics, leading to E = (P/2)mc where Pis the quantum entanglement probability. Second, a special form of E =

The probability of quantum entanglement of two quantum particles in Lucien Hardy’s thought experiment as derived in Eq (7) above is:

P = [p(1 –p1)p(1 – p)]/(1 -pp) (9)

For p = p = d

P = d (1 –d)/(1 +d) (10)

Now, introducing the probabilistic transformation:

Space (X) → xp

Time (T) → tp

Mass (M) →mp

Inserting into Newton’s kinetic energy, one finds the following probabilistic energy for v → c (velocity approaching the speed of light)

E = ½ mp (xp/tp) = ½ mp (v→c)(11)

Substituting p in Equation (3) for the probability of entanglement in Eq (2) gives:

E = ½ d[(1 –d)/(1 + d)]mc (12)

From relativity theory three phenomenological effects are well known: time dilation, length contraction and increase in mass when velocity approaches the speed of light. This is represented by some unspecified correction factor b.

x → x(1 – b

t → t(1 +b) (13)

m → m(1 + b)

Consequently, Newton’s relativistic kinetic energy becomes

E= ½ mc (1 + b) [(1 – b)/(1 +b)] = ½ [(1 – b)/(1 +

The next step to arrive at an effective quantum gravity E is to require

E = E(15)

Therefore,

d[(1 –d)/(1 + d)] = [(1 – b)/(1 +b)] (16)

This is only possible for d = b

b[(1 – b)/(1 + b)] = [(1 –b)/(1 + b)] (17)

which leads to the simple quadratic equation

b + b - 1 = 0 (18)

and the solutions: b =

In the fourth and final step, the correct expression for the quantum gravity formula is given by setting d = b = finto Eq. (6)

E = ½ f[(1 – f)/(1 + f)] mc

= ½ f

= (probability of quantum entanglement)/2) mc

Eq (19) E = mc/22.18033989 approximates E = mc/22, and can be given different simple interpretations. First, the factor 22 can be regarded as what remains of the 26 dimensions of string spacetime of the original bosonic strong interactions theory (see Box) after subtracting Einstein’s 4 dimensions. Then, the 26-4 = 22 dimensions “dilute” the energy content of the cosmos and reduce it from 100/22 ~4.5 %, in agreement with the cosmological measurement of the three 2011 Nobel Laureates.

This interpretation of energy content is not quite the same as that in the previous sections. Intriguingly, the link to quantum entanglement not only combines quantum theory with gravity, but suggests that gravity may be a form of quantum entanglement (though El Naschie himself has not said so).

Golden ratio and transfinite corrections to integer dimensional symmetry groups of string theories

The significance of the golden ratio lies in the extension of the concept dimensions, originally applying only to integers, to non-integers. All high energy particle physics theories are currently constrained to Lie algebra groups with integer dimensions that are also a differentiable manifold. Just as the concept of dimension has been expanded from integer topological to a non-integer Hausdorff dimension, the same could be done for a Lie manifold. In fact, irrational small corrections to integer Lie group dimensions would be a blessing for the overall model. Gauge anomalies (anomalies under transformation) in the standard model arise from the clash of integer symmetries (invariant properties under transformation). With transfinite (beyond the finite, but not absolute infinite) irrational corrections, i.e., fuzzy tail added or subtracted from the original integer dimension, we get fuzzy symmetry group dimensions that fit together harmoniously and eliminate gauge anomalies.
!在过去的75年里，人们对此进行了广泛的实验研究。发现了z-p，u-e衰变和m俘获，它被独立地注意到了。克莱因，蒂奥莫和惠勒，李，罗森布拉斯和我相互作用与b-交互具有大致相同的优势。它们是称为弱互动，在过去几年中，他们的地位一直在不断。通过发现许多其他弱的相互作用对奇怪的部分的衰败负责。一致的和引人注目的他们几乎一致的力量模式仍然是今天最诱人的模式之一。现象-我们稍后会再讨论的话题。最后一类力，引力，我们只需要提到原子和核的相互作用是如此微弱以至于完全可以忽略不计在所有的观察中使用现有的技术。现在回到8r难题。1953年，Dalitz和Fabri7指出在8和t的衰变中…结论：(A)过去关于弱相互作用的实验实际上对平等保护问题没有任何影响。(B)在强相互作用中，即上文讨论的第1和第2类的相互作用中，确实有许多实验建立了奇偶守恒精确度很高，但不够高，不能揭示了弱相互作用中缺乏奇偶守恒的影响。弱相互作用中的奇偶守恒被认为是所以没有实验的支持是非常令人吃惊的。但是更重要的是令人吃惊的是，物理学家们认为时空对称定律(这种前景并没有引起人们的兴趣。我们，可以说，是因为对其他各种努力，以理解8r的谜题，已经制造了10。我们稍后会提到，物理学中有一个守恒定律-Interac…的同位素自旋守恒奇偶守恒的分解引起了许多问题的关注。关于物理学中的对称性定律，我们现在将简要讨论((A)正如lee博士所讨论的，吴、安布勒及他们的实验。合作者还证明了13，14电荷共轭不变被违反了。对于/？-衰变.另一种称为时间反转不变性的对称性在()反射不变性、电荷共轭三种离散不变性不变性和时间反转不变性-由一个重要的定理17称为CPT定理。利用这个定理我们可以证明13关于实验表现的一些一般结果在弱相互作用中可能违反这三种对称性。特别令人感兴趣的是，时间反转不变性在弱的相互作用可能是完整的。虽然奇偶守恒破坏的cpt定理，右…不像洛伦兹不变性或反射不变性，它不是与时空有关的几何对称律。不变性.不象电荷共轭不变性21似乎起源于复数的代数性质发生在量子力学中，在这些方面类似于守恒电荷定律和重粒子定律。然而，后一种定律是精确的。而同位素自旋守恒在引入电磁相互作用和弱相互作用同位素自旋守恒的起源及其与自旋守恒的结合其他对称性定律无疑是当前最突出的问题之一。之前提到过所有不同品种的弱者相互作用具有非常相似的力量的特性。过去一年关于宇称非守恒的实验工作表明，他们也很可能分享不尊重平价守恒的特性。和电荷共轭不变性。因此，它们有助于区分一旦一个人确定了物质的定义，就会向左和向右移动.人们也可以利用弱相互作用来区分物质。反物质一旦选择了右对左的定义，如果时间倒转的话。不变性被违背，弱的相互作用甚至可以用来区分。同时从左向右，从反物质出发。