正文翻譯
原創翻譯：龍騰網 http://www.ltaaa.com 翻譯：yzy86 轉載請註明出處
總分：6.4/10
評論翻譯
原創翻譯：龍騰網 http://www.ltaaa.com 翻譯：yzy86 轉載請註明出處
1、10/10 This is a complete myth! The fun part is: What if it was true?
10星 短評：這完全就是一個虛構的故事！而好玩的部分在於：萬一這是真的呢？
This film has greatly polarized critics for its use of controversial concepts. I am a scientist and of course this movie gives me mixed feelings about its science. But I''''m sure about one thing, that this is fiction. I am able to watch a fiction movie, am I not?
這部影片因為用上了一些頗有爭議的概念，收到了兩極分化的評價。我是科學家，而這部片子在有關科學的方面，無疑給了我很複雜的感受。但有一件事我是很肯定的，也即它是虛構的故事。看一部科幻片，這個肚量我還是有的，不是嗎？
Some people review this film negatively for its scientific value, ignoring the fact that this isn''''t a documentary. What are these guys comparing this film against? There is no comparison against real-world science here. If somebody makes a film about black holes, I expect it to be faithful to the latest research about black holes. If somebody makes a film about the Sun, I expect it to be faithful to what we know about the Sun. In contrast, a film about aliens can stretch our suspension of disbelief a lot more, because we know no real aliens to compare it about. And my my, how wide a range of alien species has been spawned by the film industry in all its years! The main concept in this film is equally flexible because it has been proved a myth years ago. Everybody knows that, director/writer Besson knows that. These negative reviewers miss the entertainment value of this film because of something they were expecting (harmony to actual science) that was never there since the film''''s inception.
有些人會因為這部影片的科學價值而作出負面的評論，無視了它不是一部紀錄片的事實。這些人是把這部片子拿去和什麼做比較了？這部片子和現實世界的科學是完全不可比的。要是有人拍了一部有關黑洞的片子，我會期待它能忠實於黑洞領域的最新研究。要是有人拍了一部有關太陽的電影，我會期待它能忠實於我們對太陽的認知。相反，一部有關外星人的電影能讓暫停懷疑的狀態綿延得更遠，因為我們完全不瞭解真正的外星人，也便無從比較了。而且額的神吶，在整個影史中，電影工業可是炮製出了種類如此繁多的外星人種族呢！這部片子的主要理念也同樣是見仁見智頗富詮釋空間，因為這在多年以前就已經被證明為是一個神話了。所有人都清楚這一點，導演兼編劇的呂克貝松也清楚這一點。這些惡評者因為自己的期待而錯失了本片的娛樂價值，而本片中他們所期待的東西從一開始就不存在。
（譯註：“暫停懷疑”的概念（suspension of disbelief）是由英國詩人塞繆爾·泰勒·柯勒律治（1772-1834）創造的，描述的去欣賞具想象力的文學或戲劇作品所需的心態，後者是英國浪漫主義文學的奠基人之一）
Remember, critics and joes thought Boondock Saints, Donnie Darko, and Star Wars blew... yeah. Watch it for yourself. If you''''re a Luc Besson fan, you won''''t be disappointed.
你們可要記住，評論家和暖男們曾經認為《處刑人》、《死亡幻覺》和《星球大戰》都拍砸了…現在怎麼著。你們自己去看吧。如果你是呂克貝松的粉絲，你是不會失望的。
Bad-*** car chase, science-fiction, sex appeal my goodness, Morgan "the man" Freeman, Chow Yun-Fat worthy shootout, visuals that will blow your-effing-mind, and it didn''''t even take 2 sequels and a prequel to do it.
狠辣的飛車追逐、我的老天哦那性感勁兒、摩根弗里曼“大佬”、周潤發式的槍戰、能讓你爽歪歪的視覺效果，而且它甚至都不需要靠2部續集和1部前傳，就做到了這些。
What happened to people that used to enjoy movies?
過去那些享受電影的人們都哪兒去了？
3、8/10 Not a Documentary!!!!
8星 短評：這可不是紀錄片！！！！
Check the genre of this movie, it says SCI-FI, which stands for science FICTION!! If I watched every sci-fi movie expecting it to correlate with real life physics then there would be no point of the genre. All these bad reviewers seem to be on the more intelligent end of the pole but isn''''t cognitive enough to realize they''''re NOT watching a documentary!!!! This is a good sci-fi movie, which kind of lets you imagine what you could do if you knew everything and could do anything. Obviously It''''s not possible because you would have to break the laws of physics to even get near that point but it''''s still good to wonder. Worth a watch if you like the genre.
檢視下這部影片的類型，說是SCI-FI，指的是科幻片！！如果我看過的每部科幻片，都要指望它和現實中的物理學掛鉤，那這個類型也便沒有任何意義了。所有這些惡評者貌似都屬於更聰明的人群，但他們的認知能力還不足以意識到他們在看的不是紀錄片！！！！這是一部很讚的科幻片，它能讓你去想象，如果全知全能的話，你能做出些什麼。顯然這是不可能的，因為為了能接近那種狀態，你就不得不打破物理法則了，但暢想暢想還是很不錯的。如果你喜歡這種類型的話，還是值得一看的。
4、4/10 Starts well, finishes poorly
4星 短評：虎頭蛇尾
Disappointing movie towards the end. Starts off well, everything makes sense, everything is clever, logical and interesting. After a certain point in the movie everything becomes ridiculous, unrealistic and not enjoyable to watch. The idea behind the movie was good, execution was not. The characters were also a little bit boring in my opinion. The situation the main character found herself in had an array of extraordinary things to do and take advantage of but didn''''t. Not a lot out of the ordinary happened, main character worrying throughout and not taking advantage/playing around with the situation she was in. If you''''re a fan of logical "what ifs" like myself I would not recommend it.
電影臨近結尾的部分很讓人失望。開始的時候很棒，一切都合情合理，一切都很絕妙，符合邏輯，且頗有趣味。而當影片一過某個特定的時點，一切就變得荒唐、不現實，而且看著也沒啥樂趣了。這部電影背後的理念很出色，而執行可就不那麼出色了。在我看來，那些角色也有點無趣。主角身陷的處境，使得她能做出很多非凡的事情，也完全可以充分利用這一點，可是卻沒有。並沒有發生很多異乎尋常的事情，主角從頭到尾都憂心忡忡的，也沒有充分利用她置身的情勢，也不曾耍弄一二。如果你是像我這樣講求邏輯喜歡假設分析的人，那我是不會推薦它的。
5、Lucy took the drugs, Luc Besson got high...
未打星 短評：露西磕了藥，呂克貝松爽歪歪…
Obviously the main purpose of Luc Besson with this was initially to please the audience. The poor scared girl who takes revenge on the bad guys that hurt her. But with the ridiculous premise "what can we do if we acquire the 100% of functionality of our brain" the movie tries to be philosophical and ...fails miserably. What is the meaning of life? The purpose of humans?
顯然，呂克貝松拍這種片子的主要目的，一開始是為了討好觀眾。那個嚇破了膽的可憐女孩對傷害了她的壞人展開了復仇。但本片試圖攀附哲學而扔出的那個可笑的前提假設“如果我們開發了100%的大腦功能，我們能做出什麼?”，很不幸地失敗了。生命的意義是什麼？人類的目標又是什麼？
The problem is that Luc Besson''''s brain isn''''t capable to provide such answers.
這裡的問題在於：呂克貝松的腦瓜沒有能力給出這類答案。
When Lucy''''s brain is at 20% she''''s starting to control ...tv signals! It''''s obvious that the writer will hit a wall by his own brain limitations. At 30-40% she has telepathic and telekinetic powers. Later she travels back in...time, and the way she controls it is with...swipe move as in a smartphone! What else is there? The writer couldn''''t think of anything else!
當露西的大腦開發到20%時，她開始能控制電視信號了！顯然，編劇會因為他自己大腦的限制而撞到南牆。開發到30%至40%時，她解鎖了心靈感應能力和念力。之後，她穿越時間回到了過去，而她只消用手滑拉兩下就能操控這個法門，就跟滑手機似的！此處還有什麼別的呢？這編劇想不出其他任何東西！
I am everywhere! It''''s now a cliché since Edgar in "electric dreams". Johnny Depp has done it too! Well good for you.
我無處不在！自《電腦夢幻曲》中的埃德加使用過以後，現在這句話已經成陳詞濫調了。約翰尼·德普也說過這話！好吧，你真行。
（譯註:埃德加為1984年科幻喜劇片《電腦夢幻曲》中一臺具有自我意識的電腦）
6、8/10 A mix of science and fiction?
8星 短評：科學和虛幻的混合？
（譯註：所謂吸引定律，又稱吸引法則，是指世間萬物皆由能量或者振動頻率組成，相同的振動頻率相互吸引，並引起共鳴。人類的意識也是能量的一種）
God = a giant being who was, is, and ever shall be, trying to become conscious of Himself.
Humans = each tiny piece God broke off of Himself to create our individual selves.
Lucy = one piece of God (think = SOUL) that happened to have an opportunity to become conscious of itself.
神=一種偉岸的存在，過去現在以及未來都在試圖意識到他自己。
人=是神為了創造我們的個體自我，把自己粉碎後的每一個小塊。
露西=神的一小塊（思考即靈魂），碰巧得到了意識到自己存在的機會 。
The end is Lucy breaking apart into billions of pieces because the physical no longer mattered. It was her essence... which is why she was able to be everywhere, like God.
結局是露西散裂成了幾十億個小塊，因為物理定律已經無關緊要了。這就是她的本質…這也是為什麼她能如神一般無處不在。
I can''''t believe no one gets this. Look into quantum physics, even just watch The Secret. All we are is energy. If we take this concept to the extreme and to fiction, Lucy is what we get!
我都難以相信居然沒人悟到這一點。研究下量子力學，哪怕只是去看看《自然法則：吸引定律》也好。我們不過就是能量。如果我們把這個概念推向極端乃至虛構一番，我們最終得到的就是露西這樣的存在！
I LOVE this movie. BTW.
順便一說。我愛這部電影。
Then again I think deeply and on a big picture basis, so hopefully all these negative reviewers read this and feel like morons... because they are.
我要重申，我想得很深徹，而且是從宏觀視角出發，所以希望所有那些差評者讀到這篇的時候，會感覺自己就是個白痴…因為他們確實是。
It''''s not meant to "just" be a movie. You really think Morgan Freeman would''''ve signed up for this if it didn''''t have some deeper meaning? Look at his track record!!! Come on, people, use that gray mass between your ears!!!
它本不是為了“僅僅”作為一部電影而存在的。你真的認為，如果它沒有更深層次的內涵，摩根弗里曼會加入本片？去瞧瞧他的過往記錄吧！！！拜託各位哈，把你們兩耳之間那些灰白色的團塊（即腦）用起來啊！！！
Just saying. I love this movie. From a non-science, non-pop culture perspective. I love this movie from a transcendent perspective. The kind of POV that allows you to believe that nothing is a coincidence.
我只是說說而已。我大愛本片。我是從非科學、非流行文化的視角出發的。我喜歡這部電影，是出於超驗的角度。這種觀點能讓你去相信沒有什麼是巧合。
8、9/10 A magnificent take on the theory of everything
9星 短評：對萬物理論的壯美闡述
Lucy is an action thriller movie. Most of its screen time is taken by the fast moving action scenes and the display of super human abilities. However, despite its unscientific claim (10% of brain power) and somewhat shallow dialogue, there are moments in Lucy, where the scxt taps into really moving understanding of human condition. I guess these bits and pieces push the movie to a whole different level. If you leave the mindless shooting and "good guy & bad guy" stereotypes aside, Lucy is an impressive take on theory of everything. It really makes you think and more than that feel about the "oneness" of everything. That alone, is a really good reason to watch this movie. A real gem. Don''''t miss it.
《超體》是一部動作驚悚片。其屏幕時間有大半是被快節奏的動作場面和超人能力的展示佔據。然而，儘管存在不科學的主張（腦力開發10%）以及略顯膚淺的對話，在《超體》中還是有幾個瞬間，其劇本挖掘到了真正觸動人心的對人類處境的體察。我感覺正是這些零零碎碎的部分把本片推上了一個完全不同的高度。如果你能把無腦槍戰和“好人VS惡人”的老套路放到一邊，《超體》是對萬物理論的一次驚人闡述。它真的能引人遐思，此外，還能摸索萬物的的“合一”。僅此一點，便是觀看本片的大好理由了。是真正的寶貝。不要錯過哦。
閱讀更多 龍騰網看世界 的文章
