SCI論文修改回覆的三大原則

原則一 ——記住,回答問題是一門取悅別人的藝術:

  1. 不要讓問題影響你的情緒;

  2. 認真對待每一個問題,讀懂每個問題,確定回答策略;

  3. 回答策略就是堅持審稿人是對的;

  4. 對於審稿人提出的補充實驗,儘可能照辦;

  5. 對於有爭議的問題,要不卑不亢地回答。

  原則二——三步走策略:

  1. 引用文獻

  2. 承諾未來

  3. 進行討論

  原則三——十一項注意:

  問題的分類和回答策略

  1. 輪子的問題:分以下五步進行:

  感謝提問;同意觀點;承認錯誤;綜述別人成果;承諾未來。

  如:

  The reviewer has made a very good point here. Our original description has been misleading, and we have made correction in this revision as requested. I noticed that in previous studies, [羅列文獻]。

  This is a constructive suggestion by the reviewers. We have added these contents in the Discussion sector of this revision, which will help readers to better understand this article.

  2.哲學家的問題:we will be very glad if the reviewer can specify his questions and give us a list of questions, which will definitely help us to improve our manuscript.

  3.完美主義問題: we also mentioned in the Discussion section.

  4.外行的問題: we are sorry that we failed to make us clearly…

  5.一般性學術問題

  6.重大學術問題: 當遇到“exceptionally immature”/ “severe limitations”的評價時,建議按要求修改後再改投其它雜誌。

  7.要求補充實驗:(條件允許,最好補充)

  8.寫作,格式,語言等方面

  9.倫理問題

  10.不該出現的問題:I am sorry for this kind of mistakes to eliminate such kind of problems.

  11.科研不端:對於一稿想同時投英文和中文雜誌,必須在cover letter中告知雜誌社此事,做到透明化,才能避免糾紛。

  如果遇到SCI論文問題,歡迎與我們聯繫~~~


SCI論文修改回覆的三大原則


分享到:


相關文章: