Reading Time 1|基礎詞彙和泛讀原版

新年伊始,新的計劃,我們從基礎詞彙

泛讀原版開始!

前天的推文2018年新年獻詞丨此刻,你比任何時候更接近夢想

新媒體總監小白老師手抖把標題2019寫成了2018

他承諾大家的罰做俯臥撐視頻來了!

(視頻可以到公眾號“朱偉老師”上面去看喲!)

“白虛胖”老師表示他已經累暈了。

新的一年,小白老師要跟偉哥一樣,

拒絕虛胖,練大胸肌!

畢竟,他曾經也是英雄城南昌唯一一支全裝備橄欖球隊“南昌槍騎兵隊”的右截鋒。


Reading Time 1|基礎詞彙和泛讀原版

今天,新榜的成績單也出來了。

偉哥給新媒體部打75分。

在這裡,感謝支持我們的77萬位葫蘆娃,

新的一年,

在偉哥帶領下的韋林新媒體一定能為大家貢獻出更多,更好,更專業的中英文雙語推文和整年的考研英語複習計劃。


Reading Time 1|基礎詞彙和泛讀原版

下面進入正題:

第一期基礎詞彙由新媒體的葉子老師帶讀。


Reading Time 1|基礎詞彙和泛讀原版

大家也可以來糾錯她的發音。

看完今天的單詞之後,

領取明天的文稿,然後錄音發到我們的郵箱~

[email protected]

[email protected]

說不定明天就是你上牆了。

帶讀第一期

absolute

a.

➊絕對的,完全的 [同]complete

❷確實的,肯定的 [同]affirmative, assured

❸專制的 [同]almighty

❹正好的,恰好的 [同]dead

absolutely

ad. 絕對地,完全地 [同] entirely

absorb

vt.

➊吸收 [同]incorporate, [反]give out

❷使全神貫注,吸引

①短語

be absorbed in 專心於 [同] be concentrated

②聯想

absorbing a.引人入勝的

abstract

a.

➊抽象的,不具體的 [同]apart from a real thing

❷難以瞭解的 [同]difficult, hard to understand

❸抽去 [同]remove, take away

n.

摘要,提要 [同]brief, outline

[助記]詞根記憶:

abs(離去)+ tract(拉)→把大意從文中拉出來→摘要

abundant

a.

豐富的,充裕的 [同]ample

①短語

be abundant in sth 富有...... , 富於......[同]be rich in

②辨析

plentiful & abundant

plentiful a. 富裕的,大量的:

一般用語,指某物數量多得稱心如意,只能用於食物、金錢、財產、收穫、供應等方面,不能用於時間、空間、語言、思想等方面

abundant a.充裕的,豐富的:

指某物數量過多,只能用於人、鳥、魚、時間、雨量、資源等方面。

abuse

vt.

➊濫用,妄用;虐待 [同] injure, damage

❷辱罵,汙衊 [同] slander

n.

➊濫用,妄用 [同] corruption

❷辱罵,汙衊

[助記]詞根記憶:

ab(變壞)+ use(使用)→使用不當→濫用

academic

a.

➊學術的[同] educational

❷學院的

academy

n.

➊(高等)院校,研究院,學院 [同] college

❷學會,協會 [同] association, institution

accelerate

vt.

➊加速 [同] pick up speed

❷促進 [同] promote

vi.

增加速度 [同] speed up

[名言]

The youth are the pillar of revolution. They are the defenders of revolution fruits and the forces to accelerate history toward a better world.

青年是革命的柱石。青年是革命果實的保衛者,是歷史加速向更美好的世界前進的力量。

accept

vt.

➊接受,領受 [同] acquire

❷認可,同意 [同]acknowledge, agree

vi.

同意,認可 [同]accede, agree on

泛讀原版 TEXT 1

In that mythical era when children were seen and not heard, and did as they were told without argument, everyone knew that regular bedtimes were important. "Dream on!" most modern parents might reply. But research by Yvonne Kelly of University College,London, shows that the ancient wisdom is right—half the time. Daughters, it seems, do benefit from regular bedtimes. Sons do not.

Dr. Kelly knew of many studies that had looked at the connection between sleep habits and cognitive ability in adults and adolescents. All showed that inconsistent sleeping schedules went hand in hand with poor academic performance. Surprisingly, however,little such research had been done on children. She and a team of colleagues therefore examined the bedtimes and cognitive abilities of 11, 178 children born in Britain between September 2000 and January 2002, who are enrolled in a multidisciplinary research project called the Millennium Cohort Study.

The bedtime information they used was collected during four visits interviewers made to the homes of those participating in the study. These happened when the children were nine months, three years, five years and seven years of age. Besides asking whether the children had set bedtimes on weekdays and if they always, usually, sometimes or never made them, interviewers collected information about family routines, economic circumstances and other matters—including whether children were read to before they went to sleep and whether they had a television in their bedroom. The children in question were also asked, at the ages of three, five and seven, to take standardised reading, mathematical and spatial-awareness tests, from which their IQs could be estimated.

Dr. Kelly's report, just published in the Fournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, shows that by the time children had reached the age of seven, not having had a regular bedtime did seem to affect their cognition, even when other pertinent variables such as bedtime reading, bedroom televisions and parents' socioeconomic status were controlled for. But that was true only if they were female. On the IQ scale, whose mean value is 100 points, girls who had had regular bedtimes scored between eight and nine points more than those who did not.

Boys were not completely unaffected. Irregular bedtimes left their IQs about six points below those of their contemporaries at the age of three. But the distinction vanished by the time they were seven.

This difference between the sexes is baffling Dr.Kelly did not expect it and has no explanation to offer for it. As scientists are wont to say, but this time with good reason,more research is necessary.

Meanwhile, in the going-to-bed wars most households with young children suffer, the sons of the house have acquired extra ammunition. Mind you, those with the nous to read and understand Dr. kelly's results are probably not suffering from their sleep regimes anyway.

同學們可以先自行理解翻譯

譯文我們會在明日文中給出


快去關注公眾號“朱偉老師(teacherzhuwei)”一起學英語吧!


分享到:


相關文章: