Are Chinese more intelligent than Indians?
中国人比印度人更聪明吗？
评论翻译
原创翻译：龙腾网 http://www.ltaaa.com转载请注明出处
Sam Arora，Life long student of Chinese history，culture，food，arts
I am from Indian origin, and had have tremendous amount of interaction with Chinese, in Canada for more than 41 years,I do not believe one is superior than the other, however both are extremely hard working, and quest for higher learning,But the difference is knowledge of English, once that gap is closed, it will be neck to neck competition, which is more or less we are seeing in Canada.Second generation Chinese Canadian are cut throat competitor, go and check the list of specialist in any Canadian hospital,
Saute to extremely highly disciplined Chinese Canadian community.
我来自印度，在加拿大41年多的时间里与中国人进行了大量的交流
我不认为一个种族比另一个种族优越，他们都非常努力工作，并且追求更高层次的学习，但不同的是英语知识的掌握程度，一旦这种差距缩小，将是一场势均力敌的竞争，这大概就是我在加拿大所看到的。第二代华裔加拿大人是强有力的竞争对手，去查看下任何一家加拿大医院的专家名单吧。
对纪律严明的加拿大华人社区表示敬意。
Sayan Chaudhuri, B.E. Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering, Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology,…
They aren’t, it seems to be !
If all indians are given same tutorial they would be more intelligent than chinese – the intelligence is not something you are born with, you have to nourish it !
并不是，只是看起来是而已。如果印度人都接受同样的教育，他们会比中国人更聪明。智力不是与生俱来的，你必须培养它。
Michael Lee, BSCS
statistically yes, the reason why Indians in america is doing very well is because the Indians in america are the best of India, while the best of china stay in china, that’s why china is progressive and India is not. Indians in US is brain draining India.
统计学上，是。在美国的印度人做得很好，是因为在美印度人是最优秀的印度人，而最优秀的中国人在中国，所以中国进步而印度没有。在美印度人是印度的人才流失。
Alicia
Chineses are smarter than Indians for sure. Especially, chineses always want to learn new things. While Indians have a better social skills and their language is closer to indo-European language background so that Indians have more benefits to learn English. It’s true. So, Chineses and Indians are different. Your question is actually confusing. Are you asking about learning English ability or learning deep knowledge? Or good business skills? Etc…
中国人的确比印度人聪明，特别是，中国人总想学新东西。而印度人有更强的社会技能，他们的语言更接近印欧语言背景，所以印度人学英语更有利。这是事实。所以中国人和印度人是不同的，你的问题真奇怪，你问的是英语能力，还是学习深入知识？或者商务技能？
Keith Salerno, works at PricewaterhouseCoopers
Overall China is more “developed” than India, whichever way you look at it. And the possible reasons are : let’s face it – Chinese are more hard working and disciplined than Indians. But also because Chinese autocratic governance have far higher enforcement abilities in their disposal.
Coming to the argument of “intelligence” : China is ethnically and culturally very homogeneous Nation. And Chinese gover*nt have created far more effective (and mandatory) school education system, which undoubtedly makes a random sample of Chinese school students better performing than Indian counterparts.
Real comparison would be comparing Indian and Chinese creme de la creme – the brain drain immigrants in “neutral” grounds like USA or UK. And there they perform equally well. However, if Corporate presence in high-skilled STEM sector is any indicator, then Indians outperform the Chinese.
总体而言，中国比印度更“发达”。可能原因是：让我们看一下——中国人比印度人更勤劳，更自律。也因为中国的独裁治理，让他们在行事的时候有更高的执行力。
关于“智力”，中国的民族和文化非常同质化，中国创建了更有效（强制性）的学校教育系统，那毫无疑问对中国学生进行随机抽样调查的表现优于印度学生。
真正的比较是，中国的精英人才，移民到“中立国”，像美国和英国。在那里他们表现得同样出色。然而，如果以干细胞研究领域内公司为一项指标，那印度比中国表现得更好。
Even in Chinese dominated Singapore, Indian origin school students outperform Chinese in more technically intensive A level (in spite of lagging behind both Chinese and Malays in more rote-learning dependent O-level ). Google : Indian Singaporeans (Wiki). Additionally Indians are more likely to have tertiary education than any other migrant groups.
This analysis doesn’t “prove” by any stretch that as a RACE, Indians are better than Chinese. Just like Shanghai school students’ Maths and reading comprehension scores doesn’t prove otherwise.
即使在华人主导的新加坡，印度裔学生在技术更集中的领域比中国人更出色（尽管在死记硬背方面落后于中国人和马来西亚人）。此外，印度人比其他移民群体更容易接受高等教育。
这一分析并不能从任何角度证明，作为一个种族，印度人比中国人更优秀。就像上海学生的数学和阅读理解分数一样，并不能证明什么。
5.I was in Paris last year. In all its museums – Louvre, Musée d’Orsay, Musée d’Art Moderne, and even the minor ones, you will find the Chinese by the bus loads. But not more than handful of Indians will be spotted in such places. Of course, you will find Indians atop the Eiffel tower, towards which all the Patel tourist buses head! And similar observations can be made across many cities of Europe and US. What do we infer from this? I have a theory: the PRC is encouraging its citizens to learn European civilization at its root by visiting all these museums. Why? Without a doubt, the PRC harbors the ambition of unseating the “decadent” West and one of the ways it hopes to do that is by understanding the West’s intellectual underpinning. So whether the Chinese are more intelligent or not, I do not know, but they are definitely more “intelligence respecting” and “intelligence admiring” !
These are some of my observations on this subject!
5.我去年在巴黎，当地所有博物馆，卢浮宫、 奥赛博物馆、现代艺术博物馆甚至小型的，你都会找到中国人，但很少发现印度人。当然，你会在埃菲尔铁塔顶看到印度人，毕竟所有的帕特尔旅游巴士都朝着埃菲尔铁塔驶去。这种类似的现象在欧美许多城市都可看到。我们能从中推测出什么？我得出一个结论，中国鼓励其公民通过游览这些博物馆，从根源上学习欧洲文明。为何呢，毫无疑问，中国怀有取代“颓废”西方的野心，通过了解基础知识来实现这一目标。所以，中国是否更聪明，我不知道，但他们的确更“有智慧”。
这就是我对这一问题的看法。
閱讀更多 龍騰網看世界 的文章
