为 什 么 很 多 看 不 懂 的 书, 被 称 为 “名 著”


为 什 么 很 多 看 不 懂 的 书, 被 称 为 “名 著”

大多数人看不懂的不仅仅是名著。事实上,只有少数人有阅读习惯。很多人最多刷微博和自媒体,这是他们可以接触的内容,他们可以理解和使用每天。事实上,网络文本具有更高的层次,这证明了网络文本存在着系统的精神需求。

回首名著,既然叫名著,现在就不写了。所以杰作通常远离我们的日常生活。很多人没有跨越这段距离的动力,但这并不意味着他们没有“看到”杰作。


为 什 么 很 多 看 不 懂 的 书, 被 称 为 “名 著”


我认为有三种杰作:通俗故事、个人故事和真理。

民间故事起源于民间,或是几千年来为大众创造和传播的故事。最早的自然故事是各种各样的神话和传说。在西方,有荷马史诗、莎士比亚、诗经和各种古老的音乐风格,还有四部名著。久而久之,这种“杰作”已成为文明的一部分,成为文化的母题和象征。许多人可能不读原著,但他们肯定知道,他们会有一定的理解,因为他们看到了各种改编。当文化水平达到一定水平时,他们就会阅读。


为 什 么 很 多 看 不 懂 的 书, 被 称 为 “名 著”


当然,由于文坛的精英主义,通俗小说在现代越来越不受欢迎。例如,福尔摩斯,即使是作者也认为他想写“先进”的历史作品只是为了钱,但百年来公众读者的喜爱证明了他永远活着。所以这种“杰作”其实是每个人都在“读”的。合理的“杰作”是可以流传下来的,所以即使大多数人不读,也无疑是一部杰作。”


为 什 么 很 多 看 不 懂 的 书, 被 称 为 “名 著”


“个人故事”实际上是有争议的。严格地说,它的历史很短——如果够长的话它会演变成“真理”——创作者和继续存在的影响力和圈子仍然存在,所以有很多不客观的评价。比如说,在十二年的语文课上,现代大师的作品都学过了,所以对大多数人来说,谁还记得?奥兰治,鲁迅也许就是这种文字。即使是逐字学习的单词也可能记不起来。它能否被后世称为“名著”还不得而知。


为 什 么 很 多 看 不 懂 的 书, 被 称 为 “名 著”


It's not just famous books that most people can't read. In fact, only a few people have reading habits. Many people brush Weibo and self media at most, which is the content they can touch, which they can understand and use everyday. In fact, the network text has a higher level, which proves that there is a systematic spiritual demand on the text. Looking back at masterpieces, since they are called masterpieces, they are not written now. So masterpieces are usually far away from our daily life. Many people don't have the motivation to cross this distance, but that doesn't mean they don't "see" masterpieces. I think there are three kinds of Masterpieces: popular story, personal story, and truth. The popular story originated from the folk or the stories created and spread for the public for thousands of years. The earliest natural stories are all kinds of myths and legends. In the west, there are Homer epic, Shakespeare, the book of songs and various ancient styles of music, and then there are four famous works. After a long time, this kind of "masterpiece" has become a part of civilization, a cultural motif and symbol. Many people may not read the original, but they will certainly know that they will have a certain understanding because they have seen various adaptations. When the cultural level reaches a certain level, they will read it. Of course, popular stories are becoming more and more unpopular in modern times because of the elitism of the literary world. For example, Holmes, even the author thinks he wants to write "advanced" historical works just for money, but the love of the public readers for a hundred years proves that he lives forever. So this kind of "masterpiece" is actually "read" by everyone. It makes sense that a reasonable "masterpiece" can be handed down, so even if most people don't read it, it is a masterpiece, no doubt. "Personal story" is actually controversial. Strictly speaking, its history is very short - if it is long enough, it will evolve into "public story" - the creator and the influence and circle that continue are still there, so there are many not objective evaluations. For example, in twelve years of Chinese course, the works of modern masters have been learned, so for most people, which one can still remember? Orange, Lu Xun Maybe it's this kind of writing. Even the words learned word by word may not be remembered. It's unknown whether it can be called "famous works" in later generations.


分享到:


相關文章: