Are Chinese more intelligent than Indians?
中國人比印度人更聰明嗎？
評論翻譯
原創翻譯：龍騰網 http://www.ltaaa.com轉載請註明出處
Sam Arora，Life long student of Chinese history，culture，food，arts
I am from Indian origin, and had have tremendous amount of interaction with Chinese, in Canada for more than 41 years,I do not believe one is superior than the other, however both are extremely hard working, and quest for higher learning,But the difference is knowledge of English, once that gap is closed, it will be neck to neck competition, which is more or less we are seeing in Canada.Second generation Chinese Canadian are cut throat competitor, go and check the list of specialist in any Canadian hospital,
Saute to extremely highly disciplined Chinese Canadian community.
我來自印度，在加拿大41年多的時間裡與中國人進行了大量的交流
我不認為一個種族比另一個種族優越，他們都非常努力工作，並且追求更高層次的學習，但不同的是英語知識的掌握程度，一旦這種差距縮小，將是一場勢均力敵的競爭，這大概就是我在加拿大所看到的。第二代華裔加拿大人是強有力的競爭對手，去查看下任何一家加拿大醫院的專家名單吧。
對紀律嚴明的加拿大華人社區表示敬意。
Sayan Chaudhuri, B.E. Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering, Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology,…
They aren’t, it seems to be !
If all indians are given same tutorial they would be more intelligent than chinese – the intelligence is not something you are born with, you have to nourish it !
並不是，只是看起來是而已。如果印度人都接受同樣的教育，他們會比中國人更聰明。智力不是與生俱來的，你必須培養它。
Michael Lee, BSCS
statistically yes, the reason why Indians in america is doing very well is because the Indians in america are the best of India, while the best of china stay in china, that’s why china is progressive and India is not. Indians in US is brain draining India.
統計學上，是。在美國的印度人做得很好，是因為在美印度人是最優秀的印度人，而最優秀的中國人在中國，所以中國進步而印度沒有。在美印度人是印度的人才流失。
Alicia
Chineses are smarter than Indians for sure. Especially, chineses always want to learn new things. While Indians have a better social skills and their language is closer to indo-European language background so that Indians have more benefits to learn English. It’s true. So, Chineses and Indians are different. Your question is actually confusing. Are you asking about learning English ability or learning deep knowledge? Or good business skills? Etc…
中國人的確比印度人聰明，特別是，中國人總想學新東西。而印度人有更強的社會技能，他們的語言更接近印歐語言背景，所以印度人學英語更有利。這是事實。所以中國人和印度人是不同的，你的問題真奇怪，你問的是英語能力，還是學習深入知識？或者商務技能？
Keith Salerno, works at PricewaterhouseCoopers
Overall China is more “developed” than India, whichever way you look at it. And the possible reasons are : let’s face it – Chinese are more hard working and disciplined than Indians. But also because Chinese autocratic governance have far higher enforcement abilities in their disposal.
Coming to the argument of “intelligence” : China is ethnically and culturally very homogeneous Nation. And Chinese gover*nt have created far more effective (and mandatory) school education system, which undoubtedly makes a random sample of Chinese school students better performing than Indian counterparts.
Real comparison would be comparing Indian and Chinese creme de la creme – the brain drain immigrants in “neutral” grounds like USA or UK. And there they perform equally well. However, if Corporate presence in high-skilled STEM sector is any indicator, then Indians outperform the Chinese.
總體而言，中國比印度更“發達”。可能原因是：讓我們看一下——中國人比印度人更勤勞，更自律。也因為中國的獨裁治理，讓他們在行事的時候有更高的執行力。
關於“智力”，中國的民族和文化非常同質化，中國創建了更有效（強制性）的學校教育系統，那毫無疑問對中國學生進行隨機抽樣調查的表現優於印度學生。
真正的比較是，中國的精英人才，移民到“中立國”，像美國和英國。在那裡他們表現得同樣出色。然而，如果以幹細胞研究領域內公司為一項指標，那印度比中國表現得更好。
Even in Chinese dominated Singapore, Indian origin school students outperform Chinese in more technically intensive A level (in spite of lagging behind both Chinese and Malays in more rote-learning dependent O-level ). Google : Indian Singaporeans (Wiki). Additionally Indians are more likely to have tertiary education than any other migrant groups.
This analysis doesn’t “prove” by any stretch that as a RACE, Indians are better than Chinese. Just like Shanghai school students’ Maths and reading comprehension scores doesn’t prove otherwise.
即使在華人主導的新加坡，印度裔學生在技術更集中的領域比中國人更出色（儘管在死記硬背方面落後於中國人和馬來西亞人）。此外，印度人比其他移民群體更容易接受高等教育。
這一分析並不能從任何角度證明，作為一個種族，印度人比中國人更優秀。就像上海學生的數學和閱讀理解分數一樣，並不能證明什麼。
5.I was in Paris last year. In all its museums – Louvre, Musée d’Orsay, Musée d’Art Moderne, and even the minor ones, you will find the Chinese by the bus loads. But not more than handful of Indians will be spotted in such places. Of course, you will find Indians atop the Eiffel tower, towards which all the Patel tourist buses head! And similar observations can be made across many cities of Europe and US. What do we infer from this? I have a theory: the PRC is encouraging its citizens to learn European civilization at its root by visiting all these museums. Why? Without a doubt, the PRC harbors the ambition of unseating the “decadent” West and one of the ways it hopes to do that is by understanding the West’s intellectual underpinning. So whether the Chinese are more intelligent or not, I do not know, but they are definitely more “intelligence respecting” and “intelligence admiring” !
These are some of my observations on this subject!
5.我去年在巴黎，當地所有博物館，盧浮宮、 奧賽博物館、現代藝術博物館甚至小型的，你都會找到中國人，但很少發現印度人。當然，你會在埃菲爾鐵塔頂看到印度人，畢竟所有的帕特爾旅遊巴士都朝著埃菲爾鐵塔駛去。這種類似的現象在歐美許多城市都可看到。我們能從中推測出什麼？我得出一個結論，中國鼓勵其公民通過遊覽這些博物館，從根源上學習歐洲文明。為何呢，毫無疑問，中國懷有取代“頹廢”西方的野心，通過了解基礎知識來實現這一目標。所以，中國是否更聰明，我不知道，但他們的確更“有智慧”。
這就是我對這一問題的看法。
閱讀更多 龍騰網看世界 的文章
